More about Nicole:
"As the Director of the Revenue Operations team at Greenlight Guru, I build alignment across the entire revenue organization, including Marketing, Sales and Customer Success. I have a background in technology and currently hold four Salesforce certifications.
I believe that marrying the technology with the process is key and having the ability to create scalable, repeatable processes is essential for long-term growth.
I love discussing how to build unique solutions to allow your tech to work based on your process and build better reporting, and I enjoy helping others continue to grow in their revenue operations career. If you have any questions, I’m here to help!"
Howdy Nicole, super excited to have you on the AMA hot seat with us today!
Thanks for Joining us, Nicole!
Great to be here!
During Covid, I actually decided to start consulting on the side. I was introduced to Greenlight Guru through that and have been working with them since around June of last year. One of the things we found is that they had good bones but a lot of manual processes. I built out a lot of automation last year to make it easier for the reps to do their job and I guess we wanted to keep the trend going so I became full time at the beginning of the year!
Since then we’ve been adding to the team building out sales and marketing ops functions along with enablement and technology.
GREAT question, Katrine!
What a great question. I think the sooner you can get a Salesforce admin (assuming you’re using Salesforce) in the seat the better. What tends to happen is they throw someone in it with very little experience and it creates a lot of extra work down the line. That would be the first thing.
The other thing I would recommend is getting a solid sales engagement tool in place. That sets the stage for efficiency down the line. You can go with the big players like Outreach or Salesloft but for more bootstrapped companies there are way more affordable options that can get the job done like Groove, MixMax, Outplay, etc.
And the third thing I would recommend is getting someone in there to build documentation. It could be a hybrid role for sure, but without documentation you’re setting the stage for silos.
That inherently builds into enablement.
Amazing, thank you!
So, I think they really need to understand what Salesforce can do. That’s a key in aligning the technology to the process. Using Trailhead is a great resource for that. What it also allows them to do is understand what their stakeholders are not only asking for, but what the best approach is. Usually with a big team, there comes a point where once you have a developer, they develop everything. No knock on those folks, because they’re extremely talented, but it’s a really easy way to over complicate things. Stick to the basics.
This also teaches them how to tactfully say no while explaining what a better option might be.
One of my favorite resources is salesforceben.com. Not only is it a great resource for training, but there are articles regularly released on different sales tools available, new Salesforce features, insights into sales ops/rev ops and how to transition from a more Salesforce admin type of role.
I ❤️ Salesforce Ben!
Also, find a mentor. There are tons of Salesforce admins and aficionados out there that are more than willing to help and share.
Such an incredible resource. Trailhead has a Mentor program as well!
Hey, we have a program for that too! Peer to peer and mentorship 1:1 meetings curated based on your profile and preferences. We use a platform called Meetsy for this.
Mentorship is so great in this particular practice because you can bounce ideas off each other and Salesforce has been around for so long now that you may come across someone that’s already done what you’re trying to do. No sense in reinventing the wheel but maybe modify it to support your business.
Meet with EVERYONE. One of the big keys to success is communication and building relationships.
Learn what’s working and not working, but also help them understand how you can provide value.
Everyone. It’s good to understand from the 30,000 ft view but nobody knows better than those in the trenches. Issues that a support agent deals with are much different than those that a sales leader does because they’re naturally more in the weeds.
Chances are they may be more transparent with you than with their leaders. That’s not a bad thing. Be their confidant and ensure they understand that you’re there to make their lives easier.
You’re also likely get the detail you need to help them be more successful or streamline difficult processes they’re dealing with.
Well and on that note, a lot of times, they think that’s the best it gets. It’s really awesome to watch (and sometimes difficult to watch) what they’re doing because you see certain things where you’re like ‘why don’t you just do it this way?’ and a lot of times they don’t know what they don’t know.
It’s human nature to generally pay attention to the things that are more negative. That’s really more of what I look for. Start to understand where their struggles are and what the downstream effects are to pair them with goals. If they ask you for something, think about based on the ask, what are they going to ask for 6 months down the line once they have that, and build a plan to get that done before they even see it coming. Proactivity is key.
Have a clear understanding of what the business needs and how your team is going to support it. A lot of times we hire because we’re already going through the issues so we just up and hire someone without a plan. Be intentional.
And secondly, balance the needs of the business with the order in which you hire.
Some folks in your organization may not agree and you need to tell a compelling story as to your why. Use data.
We are actually currently moving to an account based model. There are vanity metrics that you can always look at like MQAs (marketing qualified accounts) but at the end of the day, what we really care about is how much revenue did they generate.
Build standard KPIs around account and data cleanliness. This is really important because it feeds into your TAM, SAM and SOM. If you are able to get data completeness, you’re going to better understand who your target really is. In addition, understanding how many contacts at each account it takes to close a deal, what are the key industries you’re selling to or those up and coming (it might open a secret door you didn’t know about).
What value based activities are contributing to your most qualified accounts? Use that to expand your reach.
Data, data, data. All day long.
So, we look at simple things like MQLs or Close Rate, generally at the beginning middle and end of the funnel, right? But what about the things in the middle? One of my favorite hidden metrics is conversion by stage. Here you can understand if there’s a big drop at a particular stage where they go to closed lost, that’s an education opportunity and possible a process improvement opportunity. which will inherently lift those vanity metrics.
We are actually moving away from MQL and here’s why: We can have 10,000 MQLs come in but if only 10 are qualified, then it’s a pretty big waste of resources. My ideal scenario is to measure how many Sales Accepted Opportunities did we generate
It becomes a more quality based play. If our marketers are concerned with quantity, then the quality will go down.
Now, what this also means, is that this may have an effect on your quotas for your SDRs or AEs and that’s okay. But at least we have solid alignment across the GTM engine. If you have marketing measured on MQLs but then SDRs/BDRs are measured on SAOs, then no one will ever hit their numbers and there’s not a lot of excitement around that.
What a great question. So, the very first thing is building a data dictionary (for lack of a better term) on not only the metrics the company measures, but how to measure them and where to find them. Additionally, having standard reporting and dashboards that are easy to find and accessible to everyone to increase transparency. We are actually in the process of building out an action plan to create weekly councils to track various metrics. These are run, organized and emceed by the RevOps team, presenting the metrics every week and where we’re seeing trends.
At the end of the day, alignment doesn’t exist if we’re all measuring the same thing a different way.
Everything is a process, right? It’s not as simple as “I show them data and everything changes.” One could only dream. When we show what’s not working, we should be coming with solutions. Explain the why and have an alternative with a plan and set expectations on what we should see based on that plan.
Without question, and this is part of building solid relationships. You have no influence if there’s no relationship there. And there’s ways that you can shift the conversation where you can make them think it’s their idea. It sounds bad but people love their own advice 🙂.
What you’re also doing, is setting a standard for what the relationship with RevOps is. It’s really easy for it to become reactive. I dealt with that when I first got to GG. If you’re dropping everything for one small problem then you train your stakeholders to think that you will just drop everything and boom: you’re now a reactive force instead of a proactive nature.
It’s better to do things right than do them fast.
Empathy is definitely #1. Number 2 is the ability to set proper expectations and let people have an opinion. It makes them feel valued (they are) and they’re more likely to come to you to help build out the business for what’s best for the business.
Holy cannoli, Nicole, that’s a good one!
Griffin, you’re 100% correct. It’s not like you just plug it in and go. First off, no one should be buying technology for fun or without a plan. You should be trying to solve a specific problem.
Second, your evaluation process should involve 2-3 vendors and they should be explaining how they can help you solve that problem.
Third, and to your point, technology is not one and done. There are constantly new features being released that can improve your process but they don’t just magically happen. You’ve got to dedicate time to not only understand the new features and how it can impact your process, but also understand how your process is changing over time and you can leverage the tech you have (or if you’ve grown out of it).
I think trusting the process is key but understand that you are part of the process.
So awesome getting to talk to you, Nicole, and to everyone who joined in! Thank you!
Thanks so much for joining us today, Nicole, for running point on questions, Robert, and to everyone else that participated! 🙌
We chatted with Cliff Simon, who is making RevOps easy with Carabiner Group. We covered many topics from RevOps, how to create a recurring Revenue Engine, how to design a RevOps tech stack, and more!
We chatted with Siva Rajamani , CoFounder & CEO of Everstage about RevOps, how to build a thoughtful commission plan, what to do when year end planning comes around, and so much more!
We chatted with Nicole Smith, Dir. of RevOps at Greenlight Guru about building better reporting, marrying tech to process, and growing your RevOps career.
They say more money, more problems, but just think of all the operational issues you could solve... Negotiating more budget is a must-have skill!
Toby Carrington started in Finance, climbing all the way to CFO. His empathy for salespeople and aptitude for numbers made RevOps the perfect fit.
Angela Earl, VP of Marketing at RFPIO
Christine Whitehead, Vice President, Operations at Replayz
Brian Vass, Vice President, Revenue Operations at Paycor