Evolving Incentives: Aligning Sales Compensation with Outcome-Based IT Service Models

The IT services industry is undergoing a fundamental compensation shift—moving away from traditional activity-based incentives toward outcome-based models that directly reward customer value creation. For revenue leaders, this transition isn’t just a tweak to a comp plan—it’s a rethinking of how sales teams define success, how they partner with delivery teams, and how technology underpins measurement and payouts.

‍

In this RevOps Co-op webinar, Jose Aleman, VP of Go-to-Market Excellence at Everstage, and Robert Adams, CRO at IT Solutions, join Matthew Volm to break down why this shift is happening, what it takes to operationalize it, and how to navigate the cultural, data and process challenges along the way.

‍

Why IT Services Are Moving from Activity to Outcome-Based Compensation

For decades, IT service providers rewarded the easiest-to-measure metrics: deals closed, tickets resolved, hours billed. The problem? These activity measures often had little correlation to whether customers were actually achieving the business results they hired the provider for.

‍

“Activity doesn’t equal value. Customers want outcomes.” – Robert Adams, CRO at IT Solutions

‍

The shift is being driven by three converging forces:

• Changing customer expectations – Enterprise buyers are no longer satisfied with project completion. They expect measurable business impact—improved uptime, reduced security risk, faster incident resolution.
• Market competition – In a crowded managed services and SaaS ecosystem, outcome-based models create a compelling differentiator and stronger renewal story.
• Revenue stability and growth – A value-first approach strengthens retention, expands customer lifetime value and reduces churn risk.

‍

This mirrors trends in software pricing—moving from upfront licenses to subscriptions, then to usage-based billing, and now toward value-based pricing. In services, that means tying compensation to KPIs that matter to the customer, not just what’s easiest to track internally.

‍

The Measurement Challenge: Defining “Value” in Practice

Shifting to outcome-based models raises a big operational question:

How do you measure “value” consistently across different customers, projects and service types?

‍

Jose and Robert outlined common outcome measures:

• Service Level Agreement (SLA) adherence – e.g., reducing average time-to-resolution.
• Customer satisfaction scores – Tracking NPS, CSAT or custom sentiment measures.
• Ticket volume reduction – Incentivizing preventative measures that reduce incidents.
• Security posture improvement – Mapping a customer’s maturity from baseline to target over time.
• Business KPI improvement – Tied to the client’s core objectives, such as lower downtime or compliance pass rates.

‍

“You don’t want to create a completely custom comp plan for every single project you sell. That’s a scalability killer.” – Jose Aleman

‍

The trick is balancing precision (measures that truly reflect value) with practicality (measures that can be automated, audited and applied at scale).

‍

Balancing Short-Term and Long-Term Goals

One tension revenue leaders must address:

How do you keep the pressure on short-term bookings while rewarding long-term value delivery?

‍

Robert explained how IT Solutions approaches this:

• Net-new sales team remains largely activity-based to drive immediate growth.
• Customer success team shifts toward outcome-based measures to drive retention and expansion.
• In some cases, hybrid roles blend both models to ensure ongoing engagement beyond the initial sale.

‍

This split acknowledges that hunters and farmers operate differently—and that outcome-based models work best when aligned to the post-sale ownership of results.

‍

Automation: The Non-Negotiable for Outcome-Based Incentives

Trying to run outcome-based comp in spreadsheets? Don’t.

‍

Jose stressed that moving to value-linked payouts dramatically increases data complexity. You’ll need:

• Multi-source integration – Pulling from CRM, service delivery tools, CS platforms and finance systems.
• Transformation and modeling – Converting raw service metrics into comp-eligible measures.
• Auditability – Clear traceability so reps can trust the numbers.
• Real-time visibility – Dashboards that let reps see performance mid-period and adjust behavior.

‍

“Without automation, you end up right back where you started—paying on activities because they’re easier to calculate.” – Robert Adams

‍

Robert’s sales team uses HubSpot integrated with Everstage to give reps real-time commission tracking, while his customer success team is still transitioning from a more manual ConnectWise-based approach. The difference in trust and engagement is significant.

‍

This is where incentive compensation management (ICM) comes into play—automating commission calculations, aligning payouts to strategy, and giving everyone real‑time visibility into performance and pay.”

‍

Evolving Sales Skills for Outcome Selling

Selling an SLA or block of hours is transactional. Selling an outcome requires deeper business alignment.

‍

The panel identified critical skill shifts:

• Cross-functional pursuit – Sales must work hand-in-hand with delivery, finance and CS to ensure promises made are promises kept.
• Business acumen – Reps need to understand the customer’s industry, strategy and key performance drivers.
• Value storytelling – Articulating the “before and after” picture, not just the technical deliverable.
• Change management – Preparing both sellers and customers for a new way of working and measuring success.

‍

As Robert noted, reps often don’t understand the financial implications of deal structure—effective dates, onboarding timelines and discounts can all impact recognized revenue and payouts. Training and tools can close these gaps.

‍

Designing and Running Hybrid Plans

Very few companies go from 100% activity-based to 100% outcome-based in one leap. Hybrid plans offer a bridge:

‍

• Split commissions – Pay 70% at booking, 30% after onboarding success or KPI achievement.
• Team-based incentives – Reward pods based on collective performance, encouraging peer accountability.
• Weighted measures – Keep each metric at least 20% of plan weight to maintain focus.
• SPIFFs and short-term contests – Drive specific behaviors without overcomplicating the core plan.

‍

“If a metric is under 20% of the plan weight, it’s probably not worth including—it just becomes noise.” – Jose Aleman

‍

This phased approach gives time to refine metrics, build automation and prepare the culture for a full outcome-based shift.

‍

You may want to mix plan types—commission-based, milestone bonuses, SPIFFs, or long‑term incentives. The article 12 Types of Incentive Compensation That Actually Work in 2025 offers helpful examples and guidance.

‍

Designing fair, scalable, outcome-based comp plans requires balance. For a practical design framework and best practices, check out How to Design an Incentive Compensation Plan That Works.

‍

The AI Factor in Compensation Models

While AI often gets discussed in product or service delivery, it also impacts how we design and run comp plans:

‍

• Improved measurement – AI-driven analytics can map performance to value metrics more accurately.
• Predictive modeling – Forecasting likely outcomes for new deals based on historical patterns.
• Enablement at scale – AI assistants can answer rep questions about comp rules in plain language.
• Pricing evolution – AI-native businesses are embracing consumption and value-based pricing, accelerating the shift in how revenue teams get paid.

‍

Final Takeaways

Outcome-based sales compensation isn’t just a comp plan change—it’s a business model evolution. Done right, it:

• Aligns seller incentives with long-term customer success.
• Differentiates your offering in a competitive market.
• Drives retention, expansion and profitability.

‍

But success requires:

• Clear, scalable, measurable metrics.
• The right automation and data infrastructure.
• A phased rollout through hybrid plans.
• Investment in skill development and cross-functional collaboration.

‍

If you're starting from spreadsheets and manual plans, the Incentive Compensation Maturity Model provides a roadmap—from ad‑hoc methods to automated strategic systems.

‍

Want more strategies for sales compensation transformation?

‍

Join the RevOps Co-op to connect with 17,000+ revenue pros tackling the same challenges.

‍

Explore more insights on our blog, the Everstage blog, or sign up for an upcoming event.