AMA: A RevOps Guide to AI, Consumption & Outcome-Based Pricing

When your CEO reads one too many Forbes articles and comes back from a board meeting declaring, “We’re moving to usage-based pricing,” RevOps is often the first team thrown into the deep end. In this candid AMA-style conversation, Camela Thompson, Head of Marketing and RevOps Veteran 🦄 at RevOps Co-op, and James McArthur, VP of Product Advocacy at Nue.io, unpack the real-world complexities of AI, usage-based and consumption-based pricing models—what works, what implodes, and how to avoid the most common (and costly) mistakes.

‍

How Companies Actually End Up with Usage-Based Pricing

James sees the same three triggers over and over:

1. The Article Effect – Leadership reads about how usage pricing boosts net revenue retention and decides to copy it without assessing fit.
2. Subscription Plateau – Growth in the existing subscription model stalls, and executives look for a quick revenue lever.
3. Untapped Usage Data – The product already has measurable usage, but billing doesn’t track or monetize it.

‍

In all three scenarios, RevOps inherits a multi-team transformation that touches product, engineering, sales, finance and CS. And the pivot often happens before the company has the tools or processes to handle it.

‍

The hardest part? “You’re not just tweaking price points,” James says. “You’re introducing a new operational and communication burden across every customer-facing function.”

‍

For a deeper look at these pitfalls and how to avoid them, see Where Usage-Based Pricing Fails—and What RevOps Can Do About It.

‍

Why RevOps Struggles with Product Usage Data

Camela’s survey uncovered a surprising reality: very few Revenue Operations teams perform robust product usage analysis or integrate usage data into systems.

‍

Root causes:

• Product design blind spots – Databases are optimized for user experience, not monetization. Monetizable actions often aren’t tracked at all.
• Siloed teams – Product and RevOps rarely collaborate during feature design, so metering requirements aren’t scoped until too late.
• No definition of “usage” – Without an agreed-upon metric, Finance, Sales and Product interpret it differently, leading to disputes.

‍

Without accurate, comprehensive tracking, companies risk billing errors, unpredictable revenue, and erosion of customer trust. For guidance on structuring usage metrics and aligning them to value, check out Usage-Based Pricing: Keep 4 Key Rules in Mind.

‍

Change Management: The Make-or-Break Factor

Most usage-pricing failures come from how the change is rolled out. James recommends a multi-phase approach:

‍

1. Communicate Early (and Mean It)

Announce the shift at least six months ahead, with clear timelines and a commitment to regular updates.

‍

2. Show Before You Charge

Three months out, release a usage dashboard for customers—no charges yet. Let them see patterns and predict future bills.

‍

3. Engage Account Teams

Equip AEs to have proactive conversations: “Based on your current usage, this is what your bill would be.” Negotiate before invoices hit.

‍

4. Define & Document

Specify exactly what’s billable, how it’s measured, and what actions increase spend. Prevent the rumor mill from inventing its own (wrong) version.

‍

Bottom line: usage rollouts fail when customers feel blindsided. “Nobody likes surprises—especially finance,” James warns.

‍

Forecasting and Comp Plans in a Usage-Driven World

Forecasting usage revenue is hard. Nobody nails it on the first try, but you can reduce chaos:

• For committed usage:
  • Pay reps upfront on the committed amount.
  • Add a bonus for any overage achieved.
    ‍
• For pure usage models:
  • Develop an ICP- or use-case-based rubric for average usage.
  • Revisit weekly in the first 6 months; adjust projections for new deals.

‍

Avoid full upfront comp on unpredictable revenue. Instead, blend fixed payouts with performance bonuses to minimize clawbacks—one of the fastest ways to damage rep trust. For more on aligning Finance and RevOps around these challenges, see How Finance Teams Can Survive SaaS 2.0.

‍

Usage vs. Consumption: A Critical Distinction

• Usage-based – Pay-as-you-go. Each discrete action (API call, query, storage event) has a price.
• Consumption-based – Pre-purchased credits or funds drawn down over time, with overage charges for exceeding the pool.

‍

Operational implications:

• Cash burndown (like Starbucks card balances) is simpler—dollars in, dollars out.
• Credit burndown (like Clay credits) enables multi-product pricing but demands complex pool management. Learn more in B2B Credit Consumption Insights.

‍

Choosing the wrong model can lead to underutilization, lost renewals, or a billing system overhaul midstream.

‍

Outcome-Based Pricing: The Beautiful but Dangerous Idea

Outcome-based pricing sounds customer-friendly, but James sees two massive blockers:

‍

1. Measurement – You must be able to directly track the agreed-upon outcome inside your product.
2. Trust – Both sides must believe the metrics reflect reality, or every invoice becomes a negotiation.

‍

Without those conditions—and a rock-solid definition of “success”—outcome-based quickly devolves into disputes and delayed payments.

‍

“You’re opening yourself up to negotiating every single invoice,” James warns.

‍

The Legacy System Trap

Legacy CPQ and billing systems are often the silent killer of pricing innovation. Watch for:

• Systems built for single, one-time product sales.
• “Included” usage in subscriptions without actual metering.
• Disconnected quoting and billing, requiring manual reconciliation.
• Inflexible models that can’t handle mid-term changes or hybrid pricing.

‍

Modern pricing strategies require systems that natively support subscriptions, usage, consumption and hybrids—and integrate seamlessly with metering and billing engines.

‍

For a sharp critique of outdated tools and what to look for instead, see The End of Salesforce CPQ—and What Comes Next and CPQ & Billing: Why They Need to Work Together.

‍

AI Features: Price Like a Hard Good

AI-powered features (e.g., automated CRM messages) incur a per-use cost. James recommends:

• Start with cost-plus – Aim for 6–8x your per-action cost to cover sales, ops and margin.
• Model for saturation – Price for the steady state, not just initial adoption.
• Avoid nickel-and-diming – Align pricing with perceived value, not just cost recovery.

‍

This cost-plus approach is especially critical for startups still negotiating API rates with providers like OpenAI.

‍

For tooling that can handle hybrid AI and usage pricing in one system, see What to Look for in B2B SaaS Billing Software.

‍

Rollover Credits: A Liability in Disguise

Rollover credits seem customer-friendly but create long-term liabilities and forecasting headaches. James’ advice:

• Use rollovers only during early-stage uncertainty about usage baselines.
• Remove them once patterns are established.
• Avoid turning them into an indefinite promise.

‍

Best Practices for Pass-Through Usage Costs

For cloud infrastructure or similar pass-throughs:

• Use a cost-plus markup (e.g., cost + 5–10%).
• Invoice monthly or in sync with provider billing cycles.
• Never rely on customers to self-report usage—track it internally or not at all.

‍

What RevOps Leaders Should Do Next

• Audit your systems – Can they handle multiple billing models and metering integration?
• Start tracking usage now – Even if you’re not billing for it yet, the data will be invaluable later.
• Scenario plan – Model revenue, churn risk and comp impacts for subscription, usage, consumption and hybrids.
• Talk to product – Get involved in tracking requirements before features ship.
• Communicate like crazy – Customer trust is easier to keep than to rebuild.

‍

For examples of bundling models, check out Master Your B2B Bundle Pricing Strategy. And for a real-world case of rapid implementation, see How OpenAI Implemented Nue in Eight Weeks.

‍

For more insights and real-world examples, join the RevOps Co-op community, check out the blog, and explore Nue.io’s resources on pricing strategy and CPQ.